What can we do?
Depending on your appetite for risk, there are a few different avenues if you care about climate change and want to redress this funding imbalance.
The first, and most direct, is simply donating to smaller environmental charities to survive the financial burden of the pandemic so that they can continue their work and contribute to the vibrancy of the environmental NGO sector.
The second is focusing on areas that are neglected (even relative to the already neglected area of climate change and environmental conservation). Our speakers highlighted that climate change adaptation and mitigation remains very underfunded. In a UK context, this could include the risks that rising sea levels pose to the UK’s coastal regions and communities or flooding mitigation.
For donors with a higher appetite for risk, and who wish to change things ‘at the top’, systems level work may be a better fit. Our speakers suggested high-level advocacy work to ensure that the pandemic does not overshadow the climate emergency or provide governments with the opportunity to miss their green targets as they begin to recover from the pandemic’s social and economic consequences. Another area in need of support is environmental organisations challenging corporate lobbyists fighting against carbon caps and ‘greener’ policies. Working with the media - broadcast, digital and print - not only increases awareness of the climate emergency with the public and highlights the benefits of going green to consumers but signals to businesses and politicians that this is a subject that people care about.
Funding climate change education was discussed as an approach. In particular, educating children from a young age about the responsibility for the environment and building that awareness. Whilst this is important for the future and we should be investing in this, it is crucial to focus on changing behaviours now, as we cannot wait for the future to arrive.
Whatever type of programme or initiative donors may choose to fund, a couple of universal principles emerged from all speakers. These were:
- Making 3-5 year commitments to charities you fund. It is difficult for charities to develop strategy and allocate resources if they do not know, from year to year, how much funding they will secure. For environmental charities to be successful, they need to be able to plan.
- Being willing to experiment. One speaker highlighted the need for environmental philanthropists to behave more like their opponents, the Koch brothers, funding all sorts of initiatives to see what sticks. Although the Koch brothers are able to fund issues on a totally different scale to your average donor, the principle can still apply no matter your level.